![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Home | Site Map | Buyer's Guide Search |
![]() |
Event Calendar | ![]() |
Article Archive | ![]() |
Message Boards | ![]() |
Classifieds | ![]() |
Product Showcases | ![]() |
News | ![]() |
Advertise | ![]() |
Search | ![]() |
Join Now | ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() Tax Planning With A Difference
The objective of tax planning is to defer or reduce taxes whenever possible. Unfortunately, tax planning is often complicated when state and local business taxes are brought into the equation.
![]()
One of the most difficult -- and often overlooked -- aspects of tax planning involves the sign operation's liability for state and local taxes. All-to-often, planning to take advantage of a legitimate "loophole" in the federal tax laws will reduce or even eliminate the benefits that transaction generates on the state tax return. At its most basic, tax planning is an ongoing event. Every sign professional should be on the lookout for ways to reduce their sign operation's federal and state tax liability. Many businesses have a lot of ups and downs from one year to the next. Sizeable profits in one year reduced by a big tax bill often leaves the sign operation without the reserves necessary to tide it over when business might not be so good.
Business Tax Planning 2.) Tax-reducing strategies should be developed and implemented on an ongoing basis; 3.) The form of doing business, such as sole proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, S corporation, regular 'C' corporation or even multiple entities should be reviewed; 4.) Also reviewed should be the sign operation's accounting period and accounting method; 5.) The business's tax strategy should be coordinated with that of the owners; 6.) State and local taxes should be minimized; and 7.) Tax law changes should be factored into the ongoing tax planning process. It is obvious that recent tax law changes have significantly increased both the complexity -- and the rewards for tax planning. Remember, however, law changes do not impact only on the federal tax bill.
2002 Federal Tax Law Changes Since most states use the Internal Revenue Code, the federal tax law, as the base for their state income taxes, the federal cuts threatened to reduce state revenues. Many state legislatures have forestalled that possibility -- and reduced the amount of savings that many sign businesses might otherwise enjoy as a result of the economic stimulus package -- and other tax legislation passed in 2002. With states limiting -- or taking away completely -- the benefits of JCWA, how can any owner or owners, hope to fully stimulate the economy of their sign business? The answer lies in the systems -- both federal and state.
Federal Tax Breaks—2002 Style As passed, the federal stimulus package was much smaller than the one originally proposed by the Bush administration. However, its implications for state budgets were reportedly still too large for many state legislatures to go along with. Through legislative action or inaction, a majority of states have declined to fully adopt both the depreciation "bonus" and the NOL provisions. The result will be more tax dollars flowing into straitened state treasuries while many sign businesses will face increased complexity as they account for their income and assets differently for state and federal purposes.
![]()
Bonus Depreciation Means More Bookeeping Naturally, the basis of the property and the depreciation allowance in the year of purchase as well as in later years must be adjusted to reflect the additional first-year depreciation deduction. In other words, any "bonus" deprecation claimed on the tax return will reduce the book value of the underlying asset and the amount of depreciation deductions that can be claimed in later years. Only thirteen states have laws that conform to the new federal provisions on "bonus" depreciation. Twenty-four states plus the District of Columbia have not conformed. Of the remaining nine states with personal income taxes, corporate income taxes or other business taxes that are substantially similar to corporate income taxes, most require taxpayers to add back a portion of the federal depreciation "bonus" when figuring their state tax but then allow for the remainder of the "bonus" to be taken in later years. Obviously, sign businesses operating in states that choose not to conform fully with the deprecation "bonus" will find themselves compelled to keep multiple sets of books on the current book value (basis) for each asset that qualifies for the federal provision.
Few States Like NOLS This enhanced federal carryback applies only to losses that arise in tax years ending in 2001 and 2002. Every sign professional and vendor is given one opportunity to "elect out of" or reject this treatment and the choice is final. The new law also allows a taxpayer's NOL deduction to reduce its alternative minimum taxable income (AMTI) up to 100 percent. Unfortunately, only seven states have adopted the NOL provision and only four of those -- Alaska, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Vermont -- have adopted the provision as written in the federal law. Delaware, New York and Wisconsin have adopted the basic NOL provision but limited the amounts that can be carried back. Of the remaining jurisdictions, 40 states and the District of Columbia have not adopted the NOL provisions thus far, while Nevada, Washington and Wyoming don't impose corporate or personal income taxes.
Factoring It Into Planning
Regardless of whether the states decide to accept or reject tax benefits created on the federal level, every sign business can claim a legitimate federal tax deduction for all state, local and foreign taxes paid or accrued within the tax year -- at least to the extent that they are directly attributable to the sign business (or to the production of income). In fact, even advance payments of estimated state income taxes made by a cash-basis sign business under state law are tax deductible in the year paid. The fact that a state is out of conformity with the JCWA and other federal tax breaks now doesn't mean that it will necessarily remain so. A number of states normally synchronize their law to the federal provisions as of January 1 of each year. Remember, however, tax law changes whether on the federal or state levels are not the only reasons for business tax planning. The changing economic climate, competition, the personal circumstances of the owners and, of course, the goal of both the business and its owners are constantly changing. Tax planning should reflect those changes. Tax planning is -- or should be -- a year 'round endeavor. An owner or manager should know what deductions are available to the sign operation and keep the records necessary to support and document every business transaction. In this manner, the resulting tax savings can be used to successfully operate and grow the sign business. Naturally, that tax planning should incorporate the tax rules of the state or states where the business operates.
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
© Copyright 1999-2020, All Rights Reserved. |